One of the points that I discussed in my PyConUK keynote was the role (or lack thereof) of dynamic languages in desktop software development. I know that some people believe that desktop software is dead, but I am not one of them. I think that the nature of desktop software is changing, but that it is still relevant. In my discussion of dynamic languages and desktop software, I used the example of Adobe’s Lightroom, as the best example of commercial software that is written in a dynamic language. Lightroom is written in Lua, and according to this presentation by Troy Gaul, 63% of the code written by the Lightroom team is Lua (there is a bunch of C code for the low level image processing code, which is shared with Adobe Camera Raw). A number of people at PyConUK had no idea of the role of Lua in Lightroom, which is unsurprising. The only reason that I knew was that I was following Lightroom as a photography nut, and the information flew by on some boards. Troy’s presentation is pretty illuminating, so if you are interested in dynamic languages in desktop applications, you should watch the whole thing.

Archives
- April 2012
- March 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- May 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
Categories
Tags
adobe
apache
apachecon
aperture
blogging
books
chandler
community
concurrency
dynamic languages
erlang
family
flash
flex
flickr
functional programming
gadgets
internet
iPad
iPhone
java
javascript
languages
leopard
lightroom
Macintosh
microblogging
nikon
open source
osaf
photographs
photography
programming
programming languages
pycon
python
ria
ruby
Seattle
strobist
Sun
tools
twitter
web2.0
WordPress












Lua rocks
I agree with your, Ted, that desktop apps are not dead. For some things, like image editing, a desktop app just fits better then some web app.
Here is to hoping people continue to realize that and use Python when they do. =)
Python can be, and is used to script *most* desktop graphics software.
From maya, gimp, blender, poser, photoshop etc.
Python is the graphics scripting language of choice.
Many web desktop programs are also written with javascript. eg dreamweaver has major portions written in javascript.
For years graphics and games people have been using multiple languages. From assembly, C, C++, scripting language, and also shader languages.
However having said that… the new versions of python (2.6, and 3.0) are becoming worse in some ways for some desktop software. Lack of support for older systems, and also their big size. So if you’re aiming for the magical < 2MB – 5MB download, python can use up more than that by it self.
Also, I think non-graphics, or non-game programs are less likely to use scripting languages.
Yes, desktop application, written in dynamic language are great.
I am active Lightroom’s user too. And have written an export plugin for it. Lua support is very handy, but it worth nothing without good SDK documentation.
I have been working with python and ruby of late, and was pleasantly surprised you said that Lua was used to write Lightroom, I’ve been very impressed with the product and think it is incredible that they used a non-standard language for this, but isn’t that like Yahoo Shops which was originally written in LISP???