http://www.sauria.com/blog/2008/05/13/javaone-2008-part-2/ Open Source, Modern Programming Languages, OS X, Photography, and ... Thu, 19 Jan 2012 07:08:30 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 http://www.sauria.com/blog/2008/05/13/javaone-2008-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-15275 Donnie Berkholz Thu, 15 May 2008 06:31:57 +0000 http://www.sauria.com/blog/2008/05/13/javaone-2008-part-2/#comment-15275 Thanks for responding, Ted -- I was thinking more horizontally than vertically, I guess. I'm glad I randomly checked back, since I wasn't able to subscribe to new comments. Thanks for responding, Ted — I was thinking more horizontally than vertically, I guess. I’m glad I randomly checked back, since I wasn’t able to subscribe to new comments.

]]> http://www.sauria.com/blog/2008/05/13/javaone-2008-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-15271 Ted Leung Wed, 14 May 2008 05:54:38 +0000 http://www.sauria.com/blog/2008/05/13/javaone-2008-part-2/#comment-15271 Because some folks want to explicitly not support really old versions of browsers. Also, the code completion is smart enough to warn you which methods will work in which browsers, which is also a big help. Because some folks want to explicitly not support really old versions of browsers. Also, the code completion is smart enough to warn you which methods will work in which browsers, which is also a big help.

]]> http://www.sauria.com/blog/2008/05/13/javaone-2008-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-15270 Donnie Berkholz Wed, 14 May 2008 05:51:00 +0000 http://www.sauria.com/blog/2008/05/13/javaone-2008-part-2/#comment-15270 Why should JavaScript browser support be configurable? That seems like it would encourage people to disable support for one browser or another instead of write code that works everywhere. Why should JavaScript browser support be configurable? That seems like it would encourage people to disable support for one browser or another instead of write code that works everywhere.

]]>