<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Erlang == CGI?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sauria.com/blog/2008/04/29/erlang-cgi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sauria.com/blog/2008/04/29/erlang-cgi/</link>
	<description>Open Source, Modern Programming Languages, OS X, Photography, and ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 07:08:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JavaOne 2008: Part 2 at Ted Leung on the Air</title>
		<link>http://www.sauria.com/blog/2008/04/29/erlang-cgi/comment-page-1/#comment-15269</link>
		<dc:creator>JavaOne 2008: Part 2 at Ted Leung on the Air</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 04:49:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sauria.com/blog/2008/04/29/erlang-cgi/#comment-15269</guid>
		<description>[...] particularly interested because the PI&#8217;s for Maxine worked on PJava, and MVM. Given the differences between the Erlang VM and the JVM, I think that the ability to experiment with MVM is going to be pretty interesting. Apparently, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] particularly interested because the PI&#8217;s for Maxine worked on PJava, and MVM. Given the differences between the Erlang VM and the JVM, I think that the ability to experiment with MVM is going to be pretty interesting. Apparently, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steven</title>
		<link>http://www.sauria.com/blog/2008/04/29/erlang-cgi/comment-page-1/#comment-15226</link>
		<dc:creator>steven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 15:09:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sauria.com/blog/2008/04/29/erlang-cgi/#comment-15226</guid>
		<description>As much as it&#039;s shared nothing, CGI has something in common with Erlang processes, but Erlang processes don&#039;t have to perform one operation and then die and they can communicate with each other, so there&#039;s a lot that to the Erlang model that&#039;s not even close to the CGI model.

But it is true that that they share(!) the shared-nothing increases in isolation-based reliability.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As much as it&#8217;s shared nothing, CGI has something in common with Erlang processes, but Erlang processes don&#8217;t have to perform one operation and then die and they can communicate with each other, so there&#8217;s a lot that to the Erlang model that&#8217;s not even close to the CGI model.</p>
<p>But it is true that that they share(!) the shared-nothing increases in isolation-based reliability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

