Comments on: Erlang == CGI? http://www.sauria.com/blog/2008/04/29/erlang-cgi/ Open Source, Modern Programming Languages, OS X, Photography, and ... Sun, 06 Jul 2008 07:53:41 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: JavaOne 2008: Part 2 at Ted Leung on the Air http://www.sauria.com/blog/2008/04/29/erlang-cgi/#comment-15269 JavaOne 2008: Part 2 at Ted Leung on the Air Wed, 14 May 2008 04:49:14 +0000 http://www.sauria.com/blog/2008/04/29/erlang-cgi/#comment-15269 [...] particularly interested because the PI’s for Maxine worked on PJava, and MVM. Given the differences between the Erlang VM and the JVM, I think that the ability to experiment with MVM is going to be pretty interesting. Apparently, [...] [...] particularly interested because the PI’s for Maxine worked on PJava, and MVM. Given the differences between the Erlang VM and the JVM, I think that the ability to experiment with MVM is going to be pretty interesting. Apparently, [...]

]]> By: steven http://www.sauria.com/blog/2008/04/29/erlang-cgi/#comment-15226 steven Wed, 30 Apr 2008 15:09:41 +0000 http://www.sauria.com/blog/2008/04/29/erlang-cgi/#comment-15226 As much as it's shared nothing, CGI has something in common with Erlang processes, but Erlang processes don't have to perform one operation and then die and they can communicate with each other, so there's a lot that to the Erlang model that's not even close to the CGI model. But it is true that that they share(!) the shared-nothing increases in isolation-based reliability. As much as it’s shared nothing, CGI has something in common with Erlang processes, but Erlang processes don’t have to perform one operation and then die and they can communicate with each other, so there’s a lot that to the Erlang model that’s not even close to the CGI model.

But it is true that that they share(!) the shared-nothing increases in isolation-based reliability.

]]>