Comments on: Google Contacts and CardDAV http://www.sauria.com/blog/2008/03/06/google-contacts-and-carddav/ Open Source, Modern Programming Languages, OS X, Photography, and ... Thu, 19 Jan 2012 07:08:30 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: Helge http://www.sauria.com/blog/2008/03/06/google-contacts-and-carddav/comment-page-1/#comment-16137 Helge Sat, 25 Apr 2009 13:45:38 +0000 http://www.sauria.com/blog/2008/03/06/google-contacts-and-carddav/#comment-16137 Lets hope that Google adds CardDAV support to Google Contacts when Snow Leopard is released. They did the same with the Calendar, first the GData API and later CalDAV support to connect iCal.app. rick: Darwin CalendarServer already supports XMPP PubSub (Jabber) based push for CalDAV, I suppose the same will be done in the upcoming CardDAV server. This will get you "push to the client". Lets hope that Google adds CardDAV support to Google Contacts when Snow Leopard is released. They did the same with the Calendar, first the GData API and later CalDAV support to connect iCal.app.

rick: Darwin CalendarServer already supports XMPP PubSub (Jabber) based push for CalDAV, I suppose the same will be done in the upcoming CardDAV server. This will get you “push to the client”.

]]> By: rick http://www.sauria.com/blog/2008/03/06/google-contacts-and-carddav/comment-page-1/#comment-15039 rick Fri, 07 Mar 2008 18:34:14 +0000 http://www.sauria.com/blog/2008/03/06/google-contacts-and-carddav/#comment-15039 have to admit i'm not impressed with yet another contact format. but i am intrigued with Atom as a "replacement" for DAV functionality. I had always thought of it as a "push to the client" kind of protocol, not one where the client pushes content back to the server. have to dig into that some more... have to admit i’m not impressed with yet another contact format. but i am intrigued with Atom as a “replacement” for DAV functionality. I had always thought of it as a “push to the client” kind of protocol, not one where the client pushes content back to the server.
have to dig into that some more…

]]>