Matt Croydon Didn’t agree with my commentary on the Erlang community, and he’s partially right. I shouldn’t have said “we need a community” because there is an Erlang community, and I knew that. I have never been a fan of Java, and I don’t want to be stuck using the moral equivalent of Java when the multicore/concurrency thing shakes out. So if I want to be able to use Erlang (and I’ve not totally made that decision), then it needs to have a bigger, more diverse, and easier to find community.

Archives
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- May 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
Categories
Tags
adobe
apache
apachecon
aperture
blogging
books
chandler
community
concurrency
dynamic languages
erlang
family
flash
flex
flickr
functional programming
gadgets
internet
iPad
iPhone
java
javascript
languages
leopard
lightroom
Macintosh
microblogging
nikon
open source
osaf
photographs
photography
programming
programming languages
pycon
python
ria
ruby
Seattle
strobist
Sun
tools
twitter
web2.0
WordPress












I completely agree. Why does erlang.org seem to be focussed on so much more than the language? As a first-time user of that web site, I’m pretty confused. Compare it to the Python.org or Ruby-lang.org websites and you’ll soon spot the differences.
So if I want to be able to use Erlang … then it needs to have a bigger, more diverse, and easier to find community.
Given the current high level of expertise on Erlang mailing-lists and forums what do you hope to gain by “bigger”?
Given how many Erlang users work in telecomms I think I understand what you mean by “more diverse” – although you might get a slightly different impression from the User Conferences and Workshops.
Given that Google pops-up erlang.org straight-away what do you mean by “easier to find”?
Asbjørn Ulsberg wrote Why does erlang.org seem to be focussed on so much more than the language?
Maybe for experienced Erlangers there is so much more than the language.
It looks like an old-fashioned website; to help improve it you’re comments need to be much more specific – “Compare it to the Python.org or Ruby-lang.org websites and you’ll soon spot the differences” just doesn’t help.
- note how ruby-lang.org says “RubyConf 2007″ and erlang.org says “Sixth ACM SIGPLAN Erlang Workshop” & “12th Erlang/OTP User Conference”
- note how ruby-lang.org says “Ruby 1.8.6 released!” and erlang.org says “Erlang/OTP R11B-5 released”
- note how ruby-lang.org has a side-bar “Get Started” and erlang.org has a side-bar “Getting started”
Bigger – For example, more people working on libraries for stuff besides telecom. More people to answer questions so that core people don’t burn out doing that
Easier to find – Matt’s point was that it was harder to find. I didn’t find it hard to locate.
I dont’ think that was Matt’s point. I think he was being excessively apologetic
“… it’s just smaller than you’re used to, and might be a little harder to find than most”
in an attempt to excuse “we need a communityâ€.