<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sometimes reading is useful&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sauria.com/blog/2007/06/12/sometimes-reading-is-useful/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sauria.com/blog/2007/06/12/sometimes-reading-is-useful/</link>
	<description>Open Source, Modern Programming Languages, OS X, Photography, and ...</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 04:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ted Leung</title>
		<link>http://www.sauria.com/blog/2007/06/12/sometimes-reading-is-useful/#comment-6271</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Leung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 21:12:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sauria.com/blog/2007/06/12/sometimes-reading-is-useful/#comment-6271</guid>
		<description>I'm not convinced that improving multicore performance is all that is needed to rectify the problems I am seeing w/ spotlight, although it will certainly help</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not convinced that improving multicore performance is all that is needed to rectify the problems I am seeing w/ spotlight, although it will certainly help</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sjan Evardsson</title>
		<link>http://www.sauria.com/blog/2007/06/12/sometimes-reading-is-useful/#comment-6270</link>
		<dc:creator>Sjan Evardsson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 20:55:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sauria.com/blog/2007/06/12/sometimes-reading-is-useful/#comment-6270</guid>
		<description>I have no way of verifying this, but it seems from the blurbage on &lt;a href="http://www.apple.com/macosx/leopard/technology/multicore.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;this page&lt;/a&gt; that Spotlight performance should be much improved. The page says:
&lt;blockquote cite="http://www.apple.com/macosx/leopard/technology/multicore.html"&gt;Apple engineers have updated several applications in Leopard — including Mail, Address Book, and Font Utility — to be fully multicore ready. Each of these apps breaks up processor-intensive actions into a series of more manageable steps that execute one by one on single-CPU computers and in parallel on newer, multicore systems. &lt;b&gt;Cocoa uses that same technology to speed up Spotlight searches and Dictionary lookups.&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
(emphasis mine)

How this plays out in reality remains to be seen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no way of verifying this, but it seems from the blurbage on <a href="http://www.apple.com/macosx/leopard/technology/multicore.html" rel="nofollow">this page</a> that Spotlight performance should be much improved. The page says:</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.apple.com/macosx/leopard/technology/multicore.html"><p>Apple engineers have updated several applications in Leopard — including Mail, Address Book, and Font Utility — to be fully multicore ready. Each of these apps breaks up processor-intensive actions into a series of more manageable steps that execute one by one on single-CPU computers and in parallel on newer, multicore systems. <b>Cocoa uses that same technology to speed up Spotlight searches and Dictionary lookups.</b></p></blockquote>
<p>(emphasis mine)</p>
<p>How this plays out in reality remains to be seen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
