<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Everything is dead, except Apple and the Web</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sauria.com/blog/2007/04/13/everything-is-dead-except-apple-and-the-web/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sauria.com/blog/2007/04/13/everything-is-dead-except-apple-and-the-web/</link>
	<description>Open Source, Modern Programming Languages, OS X, Photography, and ...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 07:08:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bowerbird</title>
		<link>http://www.sauria.com/blog/2007/04/13/everything-is-dead-except-apple-and-the-web/comment-page-1/#comment-2930</link>
		<dc:creator>bowerbird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2007 21:58:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sauria.com/blog/2007/04/13/everything-is-dead-except-apple-and-the-web/#comment-2930</guid>
		<description>why won&#039;t your site reflow the text when i resize my window
to be as narrow as i would like it?  i consider this to be a bug.
-bowerbird

p.s.  you don&#039;t have to post this, but i had to ask it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why won&#8217;t your site reflow the text when i resize my window<br />
to be as narrow as i would like it?  i consider this to be a bug.<br />
-bowerbird</p>
<p>p.s.  you don&#8217;t have to post this, but i had to ask it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabe</title>
		<link>http://www.sauria.com/blog/2007/04/13/everything-is-dead-except-apple-and-the-web/comment-page-1/#comment-2776</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2007 00:20:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sauria.com/blog/2007/04/13/everything-is-dead-except-apple-and-the-web/#comment-2776</guid>
		<description>Kim: That hardware you speak of runs software, and those services &lt;em&gt;are&lt;/em&gt; software. So I fail to see how this leaves no room for open source.

As Ted said, this is where open source is truly interestingâ€”as a collaborative means of producing and composing this software and these services, where everyone sharing helps everyone win.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kim: That hardware you speak of runs software, and those services <em>are</em> software. So I fail to see how this leaves no room for open source.</p>
<p>As Ted said, this is where open source is truly interestingâ€”as a collaborative means of producing and composing this software and these services, where everyone sharing helps everyone win.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kimberly</title>
		<link>http://www.sauria.com/blog/2007/04/13/everything-is-dead-except-apple-and-the-web/comment-page-1/#comment-2766</link>
		<dc:creator>Kimberly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 20:59:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sauria.com/blog/2007/04/13/everything-is-dead-except-apple-and-the-web/#comment-2766</guid>
		<description>Whether you agree or not, there has been (it seems) a whole lot of talk these days about the death of Microsoft.  Just the fact that people are thinking this way is a big sign of a sea change.  (Shelly Palmer has written similar things about Microsoft&#039;s current irrelevance -- see &lt;a href=&quot;http://advancedmediacommittee.typepad.com/emmyadvancedmedia/2007/02/cracked_windows.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&quot;Cracked Windows&quot;&lt;/a&gt; on Medias 3.0.)

As for Open Source, I think we&#039;re also seeing the rise of new hardware.  And hardware that connects to services.  That combination, currently, leaves no real room for open source. 

- Kimberly</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whether you agree or not, there has been (it seems) a whole lot of talk these days about the death of Microsoft.  Just the fact that people are thinking this way is a big sign of a sea change.  (Shelly Palmer has written similar things about Microsoft&#8217;s current irrelevance &#8212; see <a href="http://advancedmediacommittee.typepad.com/emmyadvancedmedia/2007/02/cracked_windows.html" rel="nofollow">&#8220;Cracked Windows&#8221;</a> on Medias 3.0.)</p>
<p>As for Open Source, I think we&#8217;re also seeing the rise of new hardware.  And hardware that connects to services.  That combination, currently, leaves no real room for open source. </p>
<p>- Kimberly</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rick</title>
		<link>http://www.sauria.com/blog/2007/04/13/everything-is-dead-except-apple-and-the-web/comment-page-1/#comment-2761</link>
		<dc:creator>rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 19:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sauria.com/blog/2007/04/13/everything-is-dead-except-apple-and-the-web/#comment-2761</guid>
		<description>The notion of &quot;lowered expectations&quot; when dealing with web apps is a key point. We could end up with two tiers of apps as a result: the low-end web-based and the &quot;pro&quot; version that requires a download/installation.

You could argue that a stratification/simplification of the UI would provide a way to manage webapp complexity - but so far I&#039;ve seen complex UI&#039;s be pretty tricky to implement in JS and rather slow to use.

Ed&#039;s got a point, but I think Graham&#039;s point was more that their business models are going to change. Office, Windows, Servers and Services make up different portions of their business. This mix will end up changing.

PS: Ed: you&#039;re supposed to switch them. If they&#039;re only running Web and Mail they don&#039;t need anything but Firefox and Thunderbird - and they run everywhere!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The notion of &#8220;lowered expectations&#8221; when dealing with web apps is a key point. We could end up with two tiers of apps as a result: the low-end web-based and the &#8220;pro&#8221; version that requires a download/installation.</p>
<p>You could argue that a stratification/simplification of the UI would provide a way to manage webapp complexity &#8211; but so far I&#8217;ve seen complex UI&#8217;s be pretty tricky to implement in JS and rather slow to use.</p>
<p>Ed&#8217;s got a point, but I think Graham&#8217;s point was more that their business models are going to change. Office, Windows, Servers and Services make up different portions of their business. This mix will end up changing.</p>
<p>PS: Ed: you&#8217;re supposed to switch them. If they&#8217;re only running Web and Mail they don&#8217;t need anything but Firefox and Thunderbird &#8211; and they run everywhere!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed</title>
		<link>http://www.sauria.com/blog/2007/04/13/everything-is-dead-except-apple-and-the-web/comment-page-1/#comment-2758</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 18:51:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sauria.com/blog/2007/04/13/everything-is-dead-except-apple-and-the-web/#comment-2758</guid>
		<description>Paul Graham needs to step outside of his tech savvy circle of friends and visit an average, non-geeky family where &quot;Internet Explorer&quot; equals &quot;The Internet&quot; and &quot;Outlook (Express)&quot; equals &quot;e-mail&quot; and then decide if Microsoft is dead.  I don&#039;t think they are dead.  I just think less people pay attention to what they are doing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paul Graham needs to step outside of his tech savvy circle of friends and visit an average, non-geeky family where &#8220;Internet Explorer&#8221; equals &#8220;The Internet&#8221; and &#8220;Outlook (Express)&#8221; equals &#8220;e-mail&#8221; and then decide if Microsoft is dead.  I don&#8217;t think they are dead.  I just think less people pay attention to what they are doing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

