<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who said dynamic language performance doesn&#8217;t count?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sauria.com/blog/2007/04/11/who-said-dynamic-language-performance-doesnt-count/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sauria.com/blog/2007/04/11/who-said-dynamic-language-performance-doesnt-count/</link>
	<description>Open Source, Modern Programming Languages, OS X, Photography, and ...</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 04:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: What I accidently learnt about programming &#187; Open source Scaling Ruby vs PHP</title>
		<link>http://www.sauria.com/blog/2007/04/11/who-said-dynamic-language-performance-doesnt-count/#comment-3203</link>
		<dc:creator>What I accidently learnt about programming &#187; Open source Scaling Ruby vs PHP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 08:30:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sauria.com/blog/2007/04/11/who-said-dynamic-language-performance-doesnt-count/#comment-3203</guid>
		<description>[...] Ted Leung [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ted Leung [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rick</title>
		<link>http://www.sauria.com/blog/2007/04/11/who-said-dynamic-language-performance-doesnt-count/#comment-2762</link>
		<dc:creator>rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2007 19:50:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sauria.com/blog/2007/04/11/who-said-dynamic-language-performance-doesnt-count/#comment-2762</guid>
		<description>yes, an enlightening article. Slower than Python, sheesh!
of course, rapid development of a system can be a key point in making/breaking it. Would they have gotten Twitter off the ground if they had chosen a different framework?

Does this mean the RonR model is good mainly for prototyping and startup? Then once you've proven its
viable, and/or need to scale you switch gears? What's the
next step: Pyhon/TurboGears, PHP/Cake, Java/?, or .Net stacks?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes, an enlightening article. Slower than Python, sheesh!<br />
of course, rapid development of a system can be a key point in making/breaking it. Would they have gotten Twitter off the ground if they had chosen a different framework?</p>
<p>Does this mean the RonR model is good mainly for prototyping and startup? Then once you&#8217;ve proven its<br />
viable, and/or need to scale you switch gears? What&#8217;s the<br />
next step: Pyhon/TurboGears, PHP/Cake, Java/?, or .Net stacks?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikeal</title>
		<link>http://www.sauria.com/blog/2007/04/11/who-said-dynamic-language-performance-doesnt-count/#comment-2659</link>
		<dc:creator>mikeal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 08:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sauria.com/blog/2007/04/11/who-said-dynamic-language-performance-doesnt-count/#comment-2659</guid>
		<description>/me smiles

From article:
&lt;blockquote&gt;If you’re looking to deploy a big web application and you’re language-agnostic, realize that the same operation in Ruby will take less time in Python&lt;blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>/me smiles</p>
<p>From article:</p>
<blockquote><p>If you’re looking to deploy a big web application and you’re language-agnostic, realize that the same operation in Ruby will take less time in Python<br />
<blockquote></blockquote>
</blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
